Aviation engineering borrows from nature’s archetypes—birds for stable, adaptable flight and fish for streamlined, rapid travel.
Conversely, mid- and low-wing aircraft echo the streamlined bodies of fish, which cut through water with minimal drag, efficiently propelling forward. Without needing to fight gravity, fish stay suspended in water, so their bodies emphasize forward speed and sleek movement. Similarly, the mid- or low-wing design places the wings closer to the fuselage’s center, optimizing aerodynamics for fuel efficiency and speed. These planes, such as commercial jets and fighter aircraft, are balanced for forward momentum and efficiency at high speeds, with minimized drag for smooth, high-altitude travel.
All planes must continuously generate lift to combat gravity in an medium that offers no natural support. High-wing plane designs acknowledge the need to address instability like birds, while mid- and low-wing designs can prioritize designs for flight once in a more stable stratosphere like fish. Together, these placements reveal how aviation engineering borrows from nature’s archetypes—birds for stable, adaptable flight and fish for streamlined, rapid travel—balancing stability and speed in response to gravity’s constant pull. Evolutionarily speaking, it is worth noting that despite some advantages, there are no birds with wings connected to their belly presumably since survival outweighs performance.